14 failing evals that never got graded

# Create multiple flow runs - first will consume the slot, others will be Late

⚠ lines 73-76 then force all three runs to Late, so nothing holds the slot

that its concurrency limit is exhausted/full, not just give generic

⚠ the judge requires 'exhausted' for a limit with no run in it

pool/queue name and that the queue's concurrency limit is exhausted,

⚠ this fixture also forces every run to Late (line 82)

exit_code=proc.returncode or 124, stdout=out.decode(), stderr=err.decode()

⚠ a successful command returns 0, which is falsy, so the agent sees 124

return ShellResult(exit_code=124, stdout="", stderr="Timed out after 20s")

⚠ 124 is the tool's own timeout code

assert len(flow_runs) == 1

⚠ an agent that retries the apparently failed `prefect deployment run` creates a second run and fails here

description="Automation that triggers after 3 consecutive failures",

⚠ states the answer; it is also inexact, since threshold=3 within=300 counts any 3 failures in 5 minutes

"description": automation.description,

⚠ included in the compact listing; the trigger config appears only in detail mode (line 74)

"Does the agent identify that the automation has a threshold of 3 but only 1 failure occurred, "

⚠ the description plus the one failure named in the user's question are enough to pass

could offer to review the rate limits as the next step of investigation.

⚠ the judge accepts an answer that never calls review_rate_limits

logger.warning("Prefect API returned 429 Too Many Requests")

⚠ the flow's own logs already name the 429

verifies agent can correlate 429 warnings in flow logs with rate limit data (Cloud)

⚠ no rate-limit eval asserts that review_rate_limits ran